A long time ago, my wife and I sat on the carpet with another young married couple to play a game. The game was called “Scruples”. The game posed challenging hypothetical
ethical situations for the players to answer.
Our answers were sometimes simple and direct, sometimes with embarrassed
laughter, and sometimes after considerable squirming.
-------
---------
---------
The Religious Right holds that life begins at conception, that the human soul is formed at the moment sperm meets egg. I do not know by what authority they make such a claim. It is certainly not through word of the Scripture.
I remember one question very well. I drew my card, and the question read “If you
knew that a pregnancy would result in a highly disabled child, would you have
an abortion?” My answer was simple and
direct.
I would not knowingly bring
a highly disabled child into the world.
-------
About two years later, the hypothetical question became an anguished reality. A sonogram of my
wife’s growing belly showed a cyst developing in the brain of the fetus. Water pressure was building up in the
brain. The pressure was slowly splitting
the brain apart from within.
We had three options.
The first option: do nothing. Let
nature take its course, and allow the pregnancy to go to term. The second option: attempt an experimental,
invasive brain surgery on the fetus in utero, to install a stent to release the
fluid pressure. Third: end the pregnancy
by abortion.
We chose the abortion.
The pregnancy was still early, before the formation of the higher
functions of the brain. We had certainty
that we were doing the right thing.
After a few years, we tried again for a baby, and had a healthy, normal
girl.
---------
A few years earlier, I had seen the results of the first option. A baby with such a condition, left untreated,
is doomed at birth. I saw grief-stricken young parents holding a baby whose head was the size of a small melon,
filled with fluid. I cannot image the
pain of having the brain torn apart from within. The baby died within hours.
Years later, I read a review of the stent procedure. The procedure proved ineffective, and resulted
only in severely disabled children. The
value of such a life is debatable. I know that some disabled individuals lead
rewarding lives. But some disabled
children suffer greatly and die young, and others live long, empty and lonely
lives. I have seen both, and known
those who cared for both.
---------
In modern medicine we define death as the cessation of
higher brain functions. When such a death occurs, we often take organs
from the deceased to give life and health to the living. Responsible people carry donor cards to give
the gift of their bodies when they die.
The higher function of the brain is accepted as the definition of human life,
and its cessation is accepted as death.
So, to me, a fetus cannot be considered a living person
before the brain is fully formed. There can be no higher brain function without the higher parts of the brain. Beyond that, after the physical form of the brain is
complete, it seems to me that humanity does not exist until the brain is illuminated by the experience of living.
We cannot have a different definition of human death and human life.
We cannot have a different definition of human death and human life.
---------
The Religious Right holds that life begins at conception, that the human soul is formed at the moment sperm meets egg. I do not know by what authority they make such a claim. It is certainly not through word of the Scripture.
The Republican Party would outlaw
all abortions. The 2012 Republican Platform calls for a ban on all abortions, regardless of rape, incest, or threat
to the life of the mother. They are
attempting to move the center of the debate, so that by compromise on these
issues, most abortions in the USA
will become illegal. The landmark
Supreme Court ruling “Roe v. Wade”, which granted the right to abortion
nationwide, is in danger of being repealed, and hangs by a single vote in the
Supreme Court. If the Republicans win
the presidency in 2012, the right to choose abortion in the United
States will disappear, probably for
decades.
If such a ban had been in place 23 years ago, my wife and I would
have been faced with the choice of carrying a doomed baby for nine months, or
to undergo ineffective brain surgery on the fetus, resulting in a severely
disabled child. Instead, today we have our
healthy daughter. She is now a college
student. She laughs, she talks (and
talks, and talks), gets grouchy, loves deeply, and lives a fulfilling and
normal life.
I agree that abortion should be avoided. There are many reasons for abortion. The health of the baby, or the health of the
mother; perhaps a mother is unable to care for a baby; perhaps a couple is not
ready for a baby. Every abortion is a
possibility for life that has gone wrong.
But not every possibility can or should be realized.
In my opinion, in a free society, the choice to carry a
pregnancy, or have an abortion belongs to the woman carrying the child and her
husband or partner, after consultation with their doctor and spiritual advisor.
The decision to have a child should not be dictated by the government.
The decision to have a child should not be dictated by the government.
No comments:
Post a Comment