Thanks to my daughter Kathy for naming this blog.

















Bald Eagle in Anchorage, Alaska

Translate

Saturday, January 23, 2021

Thirteen Political Tribes

 The United States has become more politically polarized over the past 40 years.  Growing polarization threatens the ability of our representatives to compromise without alienating their political base, and it threatens their ability govern effectively.

The Capitol invasion of January 6th may push Republican political divisions to the breaking point.  Similarly, divisions among Democrats will make Biden’s work more difficult, even with Democrats controlling the Presidency, with narrow majorities in the House & Senate (but not the Supreme Court).  I believe that our two-party system is on the cusp of a once-in-a-century re-organization, with traditional constituencies changing sides, and a third or fourth major party developing.

The two major parties are coalitions of a number of different constituencies, with differing socio-economic, racial, gender and geographic backgrounds.  I divided the constituencies into six Democratic tribes, six Republican tribes, and one Apolitical tribe. The differences between the tribes are potential fault lines that could fracture the two political alliances. 

Thirteen Political Tribes

The American voting system is the biggest factor binding these disparate tribes together.  Our system of partisan primaries tends to weed out moderates, and reward strong partisans.  Further, our typical plurality victory rules (“first-past-the-post”) in general elections tend to entrench the two-party system (Duverger's law, if you are interested)

The alliances that develop due to these forces are diverse.  The voting system forces alliances, and these are the alliances that evolved.  The alliances in each party do share broad sets of values, according to a dichotomy suggested by Jacob Bronowski (without a political context) in “Science and Human Values”.  Democrats prioritize values that join people into societies, and Republicans prioritize freedoms as single individuals.  But as the weighting of these values becomes more extreme, some individuals and groups are finding themselves uncomfortable within their own party and interested in change.

Here’s how I classify the diverse tribes of each party.

Democratic Party:                                                            Republican Party:
Liberal Elites                                                                       Law & Order Republicans
Angry Progressives                                                          Monied Republicans
BIPOC                                                                                   Salvation Republicans
Organized Labor                                                               NRA/Trump Bullies
LGBTQ+                                                                                Libertarians
Disengaged Young Urban Poor                                   Disengaged Rural White Poor

A thirteenth tribe is the genuinely apolitical, disengaged group.  This group is poorly informed, and fails to discern a difference between the parties.   The group ranges from homeless & working poor to other poorly informed and cynically disengaged non-voters.

Women tend to favor the Democratic Party, but curiously, do not strongly identify as a distinct political tribe, either in partisanship, or in self-identification.  Reproductive rights are an important issue to many women (and men), but it doesn't seem to unify a supermajority of women under a single banner.

There are detailed descriptions of each tribe below.  I have not based this on any scientific research or polling.  These tribes are simply based on my perception, based on people I know or have encountered through politics.  There is considerable overlap between the categories, such that Monied Republicans may also be Salvation Republicans, and Barack Obama can be classified as belonging to both the Liberal Elite tribe and the BIPOC tribe.  But I think for most voters, there will be a primary tribal allegiance.  If you are reading this, you are probably a member of the Liberal Elite tribe, centered around higher education, as I am.  Individual politicians can gain clout within their own party by representing more than one constituency.  Examples include Barack Obama, as a Liberal Elite and BIPOC, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as a Latina BIPOC and Angry Progressive, Pete Buttigieg as LGBTQ+ and Liberal Elite, and Donald Trump as a Monied Republican and an NRA Bully.

The 2020 election and its aftermath showed significant movement in these core constituencies.  The Democratic Party lost vote share in Democratic stronghold districts, particularly among less than college-educated BIPOC, organized labor and young urban voters.  In Alaska, this was particularly noticeable in remote Alaska districts with majority Native Alaskan populations.  These losses were documented nationwide among BIPOC voters, and contributed to the loss of a net eleven seats in the US House, in an election that should have carried Democratic coat-tails.

Disaffected and disillusioned Republicans include the members of the Lincoln Project, Lisa Murkowski, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Colin Powell and staffers for various national figures.  Republicans lost vote share in the suburbs, particularly among women; these losses largely drove President Biden’s victory.

I framed these changes as losses, rather than gains by the opposing party, because they seem to be driven by disillusionment, rather than by attraction of the competing ideology.  Going forward, I expect party affiliations to be driven more strongly by education, as the right-wing propaganda machine continues to influence voters with lower education and news engagement.  I expect Monied Republicans to migrate to the Democratic Party, as it becomes apparent that Republican policies are slow death to business, even in a lower-tax environment.  I expect some of the Organized Labor, BIPOC, and Disengaged Urban Poor voters to migrate to the Republican Party.  Democrats can not take these loyalties for granted, and must provide representation and visibility to these constituencies to earn their allegiance.  The Republican Party’s embrace of white supremacy may help Democrats, but more must be done to actually maintain these traditional political allies.

The re-orientation of the tribes leaves some groups without a clear political home.  Libertarians who are disgusted with authoritarian Trumpist policies are not therefore inclined to become Democrats.  Likewise, Salvation and Law & Order Republicans may be prepared to leave the Republican party due to the abuses of the NRA/Trumpist Bully tribe, but will not be willing to accept legal abortion, LGBTQ+ acceptance, or BLM organizers and support.  There may be more groups choosing political disengagement, until a major re-organization occurs. 

In an environment of political disengagement, there is a greater risk that the right-wing extremist faction which coalesced under President Trump will again attempt to take power by a combination of political gains, intimidation and force.  The next decade will prove whether the American democratic republic will long endure.

--

Democrats

Liberal Elites -- Generally white, college & post-graduate education, professional, sometimes wealthy.

Urban (especially university areas) and suburban.

Loyal mainstream Democratic supporters.

Policy wonk mentality, credentialists.

Major Issues:  Reproductive choice, Climate Change, gun control, wealth inequality, social justice (but less interested than Angry Progressives and BIPOC), mixed opinions on global trade, generally anti-military spending and involvement.

Angry Progressives

Mainly younger voters

Anti-corporate, anti-capitalism.  Want change now, or better, yesterday.

Major issues: Medicare for all, climate action, green new deal, wealth inequality, social justice (intersectionality, decolonization, de-funding police, internationally isolationist, anti-global trade.

Unhappy with mainstream Democrats.

            Sometimes low-engagement voters, often don’t see differences between the major parties

BIPOC – Black, Indigenous, and People of Color, and Immigrants

Minority, usually urban (Black and Hispanic) or rural (Indigenous) voters

Loyal Democratic supporters

Want representation; are sometimes unhappy if support for Democrats is not repaid with representation.

Major issues: Community support & development, BLM, judicial and policing reform, aid to families, anti-poverty programs.  Reparation for enslavement and colonization is a growing interest.  Climate Change is a major issue for Indigenous groups.

Some alignment with Salvation Republicans on religious issues, but this is generally out-weighed by racial and ethnic issues.  Noteworthy is the rejection of Latinx identification by many Hispanic voters, who differentiate themselves by national origin. 

Labor – Middle-class and working-class families, mostly urban to suburban.

Traditionally reliable Democratic voters, but taking direction from union leadership.  In recent years, unions have been willing to shift allegiance to individual Republican state office-holders in exchange for specific concessions. 

Labor voters have much in common with Law-and-Order Republicans, in terms of income, wealth, education and attitudes toward race.  Labor voters may be easily persuaded to shift allegiance to Republicans.

Major Issues:  Union power, rights, & representation in government, union governmental contracts for pay & benefits.

LGBTQ+ – Mostly urban constituency, cutting across many other social, economic and ethnic divisions. 

Loyal Democratic voters, activists and office-holders, disproportionately politically active.  Driven by political and religious opposition, and by success in achieving equal rights in recent decades. 

Major Issues:  Civil rights and representation.  The history of LGBTQ+ repression has promoted greater empathy for other marginalized groups.

Disengaged Young Urban Poor

This constituency leans Democratic, but turnout is lowest of major voting groups.  Turnout of young voters is about half of that of elder voters, greatly hurting their political influence and policies favoring their constituency.  Generally less educated than Angry Progressives, and less partisan.  Less informed than other major voting groups, and unmotivated to vote, due to feelings of futility.  Some overlap with BIPOC group.

 

Republican

Law-and-Order Republicans—This is the Republican mainstream.

Suburban to rural, generally middle-class to working-class white, thrifty homeowners.  Includes military and police families, and many older white citizens; mostly suburban to rural, somewhat more men than women. This group is centered around respect for official authority and national symbols – police, military, flag and anthem.  They give these things almost religious significance, such that criticism of them is considered sacrilege.  This group values conformity, obedience and self-reliance.  Patriotism and tradition are highly valued.  This group is generally Christian and white.  There is large overlap with Salvation Republicans, but with different weighting of religious and authoritarian values. 

These are loyal Republican voters and exclusive consumers of Fox News, Rush Limbaugh and conventional right-wing media.

Major Issues:  Low taxes, Defense, tough police and judiciary, conservative social policies, anti-immigration, anti-science, anti-diversity, anti-Democratic Party.

Salvation Republicans—Evangelical Christians, often attending megachurches.

Mostly white, suburban middle-class families, ranging from young to old.

This is a sub-set of Law-and-Order Republicans, but with a distinct primacy of religious issues and outlook.   Other aspects of authoritarian outlook are the same as the Law-and-Order group, including police, military and nationalism.  Their top issues are abortion, LGBTQ+ discrimination, sexual constraints and other issues regarded as matters of religious liberty.

Monied Republicans Urban and suburban White, wealthy.

White, wealthy, highly educated families with high-school & college-aged children, to middle-aged and elderly retirees.  Wealth ranges from a few million dollars to billionaires.  The wealthiest live near large urban financial center, while moderately wealthy may live near any urban center.  Primarily motivated by self-interest, Monied Republicans support low personal income taxes, low taxes on capital returns, low inheritance taxes and low business income taxes.  Also motivated by a relaxed business regulatory environment, and the concept of small government (and low taxes).  Monied Republicans have much in common with Liberal Elites, and less in common with other Republican tribes.  The main difference between Liberal Elites and Monied Republicans is a matter of personal values, rather than demographics.  As a consequence, many families in the white, wealthy world are sharply divided by political differences.

NRA/Trump Bullies – Mostly male, white rural gun owners.

White, young-to-middle aged, rural to suburban, lower-to-middle class working men.  NRA/Trump Bullies are united by a common culture with symbolic identification – pickup trucks, guns, other rural symbols.  The primary political orientation is simply hatred of liberals and Democrats.  Individualism is the primary value, and rejection of social responsibility and government.  Active on social media, and devoted followers of right-wing and alternative media ranging from Fox News, OAN, News Max, InfoWars and QAnon.  This group is the most likely to be influenced by conspiracy theories.  President Trump made significant progress in winning the exclusive loyalty to his person, rather than to the party as a whole.  This is clearly dangerous with a leader who is unconstrained by regard for rules, laws or tradition, and a group with an inclination toward threats and violence. 

Libertarians – Mostly white, male, well-educated iconoclasts and non-conformists.

Libertarians are mostly well-educated, young to middle-aged urban-to-suburban working men.  Generally well-informed but cynical about government and politics, they have a weak allegiance to the Republican party because of Republican individualistic values and rejection of social responsibility.  Generally not aligned with Republican religious values or authoritarian policies. 

 

Apolitical Disengaged

Apolitical  – Urban working poor to homeless; includes other poorly informed or cynically disengaged non-voters.  Unlikely to participate in elections without significant voter outreach. 

 

References:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-five-wings-of-the-republican-party/

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-there-are-so-few-moderate-republicans-left/

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/12/16/21012672/bernie-sanders-2020-political-science-house

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/koch-network-and-republican-party-extremism/035F3D872B0CE930AF02D7706DF46EEE

https://global.oup.com/academic/product/state-capture-9780190870799?cc=us&lang=en&

https://washingtonmonthly.com/magazine/junejulyaugust-2017/tribalists-and-ideologues/

Monday, January 4, 2021

Letters to a Senator: Congressional Certification of Electoral College Results, January 6th, 2021

The following are letters sent January 2nd  and 3rd, 2021, to a staffer for Senator Dan Sullivan of Alaska, regarding the Congressional Certification of the Electoral College vote for President, to be held Wednesday, January 6th.  

First Letter: 

I congratulate Senator Sullivan on his re-election.  This was not the outcome I, and the majority of my friends had hoped for.  I put considerable time and money into trying to prevent this result.  But I value democracy and respect the results of Senator Sullivan's election.*  He is my representative in the Senate, as well as for those who supported him in the election, so I'm writing to you again about my concerns.  If you are reading this on Monday, the certification vote will be in only two days.  Thank you for your time.  

In four days, Congress will vote to certify results of the electoral college vote to declare Joe Biden the next President.  In the two months since the general election, there has been an unprecedented challenge to the validity of that election by the incumbent and others working on his behalf.  The arguments to overturn the results of the election have ranged from trivial procedural points to absurd conspiracy theories. 
 
American democracy is under attack.  In 2016, Mitt Romney stated that Russia is without question our number one geopolitical foe.  Other commentators, notably Garry Kasparov and Masha Gessen, have stated that Vladimir Putin sees democracy as an existential threat to Russian authoritarianism, and therefore Putin is conducting a cold war against the institution of democracy around the world.  Putin’s goal is to undermine trust in the institution of democracy, to weaken and disrupt democratic nations.  
 
The threat from Russian anti-democratic disinformation is made clear in many reports, including a Senate minority staff report and a US State Department report referenced below.
 
“For years, Vladimir Putin's government has engaged in a relentless assault to undermine democracy and the rule of law in Europe and the United States. Mr. Putin's Kremlin employs an asymmetric arsenal that includes military invasions, cyberattacks, disinformation, support for fringe political groups, and the weaponization of energy resources, organized crime, and corruption” (2018, Senate Minority Staff Report, COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS)
 
“Russia’s disinformation and propaganda ecosystem is the collection of official, proxy, and unattributed communication channels and platforms that Russia uses to create and amplify false narratives….The Kremlin bears direct responsibility for cultivating these tactics and platforms as part of its approach to using information as a weapon.” (2020, State Department GEC Special Report)
 
The idea that the 2020 Presidential election was flawed, fraudulent, or rigged is exactly such a false narrative.  Republican election officials in key states declared the results completely valid, and have run recounts and audits of processes and votes to make that determination.  About sixty court cases challenging the election have been summarily dismissed as completely lacking merit.  The Executive Committee of the Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council, and the members of the Election Infrastructure Sector Coordinating Council issued an official statement that “The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history.” 
 
Nevertheless, as of today, 140 Republican Representatives and 12 Senators stated that they intend to vote against certification of the election.  The only real basis for this revolt against the election is simply that the Republican candidate lost.  The phrase Republicans are using in this effort is the hypocritical, Orwellian slogan, “Stop the Steal.”
 
The main argument of the current assault on the election is that procedural changes, made without the authority of state legislatures, to accommodate voting during the pandemic, were illegitimate.  Senator Cruz of Texas is leading the effort to invalidate the election in the Senate.  Ironically, the procedural change in Texas to close all but one early-voting site per county was also made without the authority of the state legislature.  If the logic of the complaint holds, then Senator Cruz’ election was also invalid, and he should not be seated to vote on January 6th!  In any event, there is no argument that these votes were not honestly cast for Joe Biden – the intent is simply to disenfranchise Biden voters. 

For generations, we have fought wars to make the world safe for democracy, spilling American blood and treasure.  Promoting democracy overseas has been a major policy goal since the Reagan administration.  And yet here we are, with three-quarters of the Republicans in the House and one-quarter of the Republicans in the Senate seeking to undermine democracy in our own government.  

In the weeks following the election, I was disappointed in Senator Sullivan’s slow recognition of the Biden win, because that slow recognition gave encouragement to Trumpists looking to find some way to cheat. 
 
Democracy, like free enterprise, requires truth and integrity to function.  Both fail when people cheat.  Unfortunately, many Republicans are once again showing that they lack integrity.  I have to ask, what in the hell are they doing?  These Republicans are undermining Americans’ trust in our democracy, which is the number one foreign policy goal of our number one geopolitical enemy.  This seems to me to be pretty close to sedition and treason.  Mitt Romney and Lisa Murkowski have been almost alone among Republican Senators in criticizing the effort to overturn the legitimate election of Joe Biden.  In this context, silence is complicity.  I ask Senator Sullivan to stand up for the principles of democracy, denounce the effort to overturn the election, and show faith and trust in our democratic institutions.  And to congratulate Joe Biden, commit to working with the President-elect on improving lives for Americans, and to strengthen our trust in democracy.

References:
* The opening lines of this letter are a parody of an official statement by Senator Sullivan, regarding the election of President Biden.  Sullivan's original statement, unfortunately, has now been removed from Twitter.

PUTIN'S ASYMMETRIC ASSAULT ON DEMOCRACY IN RUSSIA AND EUROPE: IMPLICATIONS FOR U.S. NATIONAL SECURITY
 
“For years, Vladimir Putin's government has engaged in a relentless assault to undermine democracy and the rule of law in Europe and the United States. Mr. Putin's Kremlin employs an asymmetric arsenal that includes military invasions, cyberattacks, disinformation, support for fringe political groups, and the weaponization of energy resources, organized crime, and corruption. The Kremlin has refined the use of these tools over time and these attacks have intensified in scale and complexity across Europe. If the United States fails to work with urgency to address this complex and growing threat, the regime in Moscow will become further emboldened. It will continue to develop and refine its arsenal to use on democracies around the world, including against U.S. elections in 2018 and 2020.”
 
“Mr. Putin has thus made it a priority of his regime to attack the democracies of Europe and the United States.”
 
GEC Special Report: August 2020, Pillars of Russia’s Disinformation and Propaganda Ecosystem
 
“[T]his report draws on publicly available reporting to provide an overview of Russia’s disinformation and propaganda ecosystem. Russia’s disinformation and propaganda ecosystem is the collection of official, proxy, and unattributed communication channels and platforms that Russia uses to create and amplify false narratives. The ecosystem consists of five main pillars: official government communications, state-funded global messaging, cultivation of proxy sources, weaponization of social media, and cyber-enabled disinformation. The Kremlin bears direct responsibility for cultivating these tactics and platforms as part of its approach to using information as a weapon. It invests massively in its propaganda channels, its intelligence services and its proxies to conduct malicious cyber activity to support their disinformation efforts, and it leverages outlets that masquerade as news sites or research institutions to spread these false and misleading narratives.”
 
“A thriving counter-disinformation community comprised of governments, civil society, academia, the press, the private sector, and citizens around the world who refuse to tolerate these tactics is pushing back.”
 
Combating disinformation and foreign interference in democracies: Lessons from Europe, 2019
 
WEAPONS OF MASS DISTRACTION: Foreign State-Sponsored Disinformation in the Digital Age, 2019

---
Second Letter:
Please note that I wrote yesterday's letter before the news broke about Trump's phone call to the Georgia State Attorney General, using a combination of threats and flattery to convince Raffensperger to create false election results.

This news reinforces what I had to say in that letter.  The efforts by Trump and his allies to overturn the election are clearly illegal.  
Senator Murkowski has spoken out against this violation of democracy.  We are in serious banana-republic territory with the Congressional challenge to the electoral college, and Senator Sullivan's silence is complicity.

I was an internal technical auditor for a couple of years for the company that once supplied half of the natural gas to South-Central Alaska.  We once had a region manager (not in Alaska) who made bullying demands of his engineers to change the numbers, similar to Trump's call to Raffensperger.  We fired the region manager, and disciplined the engineers who complied with the manager's demand to change the numbers. By enforcing integrity, we ensured that our customers had enough gas to heat homes and have electricity; our shareholders received truthful accounts of the company's financial condition, and we were protected from lawsuits.

Integrity matters in all things.  Cheating is wrong, and it is important to say so, loudly. 
I'm waiting for Senator Sullivan and many other Republicans to show some integrity regarding Trump's campaign to overturn the election. 

Sunday, November 15, 2020

The Values Project

 

About a year ago, I began something I called “The Values Project”.   I decided to try to identify the core values held by Democrats, and to communicate those values to help with the public perception of the Democratic identity.  It was a fairly simple project.  At the time, I was recruiting Democratic candidates for the Alaska State House and State Senate, and I incorporated the Values Project into the recruiting process.  In each interview, I asked potential state candidates about their values.  I also posed the same question to state party leaders, candidates for national office, Democratic donors and rank-and-file members in my home district.  As another exercise, I had attendees at a fund-raiser write lists of their values, and I compiled their answers.  In time a pattern became apparent, with enough similarity between individuals that I could list a number of core values.  Although individuals expressed their core values using different words, after some reflection, a small number of key concepts emerged as uniting principles. 

I began The Values Project after reading George Lakoff’s book “Don’t Think of an Elephant”.  The book, along with others by Lakoff, advises Democrats to communicate more about values instead of issues.  Drew Weston’s book “The Political Brain” makes many of the same points.  Weston documents conservative successes and liberal failures in communicating with voters.  Conservative successes are linked to simplistic emotional appeals.  Liberal failures often involve technical discussions of policy, rather than establishing an emotional connection to voters.  Obviously, the values that establish that emotional connection between the Party and the voters need to be authentic, meaningful and valid. 

The conversations about values were some of the most interesting and rewarding I’ve had in many years.  Some individuals described just one or two deeply meaningful personal values (“integrity” or “kindness”), while others had well-considered, multidimensional and prioritized sets of values.  A few individuals needed to be coaxed away from talking about issues (“education and health care”) to the idea of values (“fairness and opportunity”).  But once people became engaged with the idea of values it was interesting to see how they converged on many of the same concepts.   


The List of Core Democratic Values

From that input, I created a set of core values in roughly prioritized order.  Each core value included a set of similar ideas, representing different facets of that core value.  I first organized the ideas into sets using common themes.  (I later found that gathering sets of related ideas into a set of core values is a process recommended by values consultant Scott Jeffrey.)  I then wrote a proposal to amend the State Platform as a resolution for my Democratic House District group.  Friends in my home district contributed the first of several rounds of editing, improving the organization of the values and the clarity of the proposal.

Kindness – empathy, compassion, generosity, care.

Truth – integrity, honesty, accountability.

Equity – justice, fairness, democracy, diversity, respect, human dignity, equal opportunity, intentional inclusiveness.

Service – work ethic, productivity, humility.

Progress – economic development, science, technology, social development, economic opportunity, better life.

Responsibility – responsibility to others, obligation to leave a better world for the future, stewardship of human, natural & financial resources, responsibility to nature for its own sake.

Ethics – high standards of personal and collective behavior.

The Democrats in my home district proposed a resolution to the State Platform Committee to add these values as a Preamble to the State Democratic Party Platform.  After two more rounds of editing and word-smithing the proposal, the Preamble was added to the State Party Platform by unanimous consent at the 2020 Convention.

Personal Views

I disagree with a few of the changes made in the editing process. The core value of kindness was reframed by editors as empathy.  To me, kindness is an action, whereas empathy is a feeling.  Empathy might be a motivation, but kindness is a superior value.  I might feel empathy for refugees, but unless I take action to provide them with shelter and food, I have failed to make their lives better. 

Also, I originally included a value for protecting nature for its own sake.  This concept was folded into responsibility, but protecting nature for future generations is not the same idea as protecting nature for its own sake.  We should hold the value of protecting the natural world without regard for its utility to humankind, and I’m not sure that is clear in the final document.  But in general, the editing process improved the list of values, and helped the members of the Platform Committee take ownership of the values statement as their own.

The final version, the Preamble to the Platform of the Alaska Democratic Party, is shown below. 

Values Not Included as Unifying Democratic Values

Some of the values expressed by the people I interviewed included “community” and “family”.  I did not include these in the list of Democratic values, because I thought that they were not necessarily among our uniting Democratic values.  These values are simply human values, and would certainly be among the values listed by conservatives or Republicans.  In particular, it seems to me that “Community” is an exclusionary value, suggesting that we only care about those of our own kind, in our own place.  I thought that Democratic values should be inclusive, and we should care also for the refugee, the immigrant, and the outcast. 

There were few suggestions about faith as a core value, although there are clearly people of deep faith in my cohort of Democrats.  Still, faith is not a uniting value for Democrats. Rather, we are inclusive of people of faith and people who do not hold religious beliefs. 

Patriotism also does not appear on this list, although Democrats are clearly patriotic and love our country dearly.  Nevertheless, it is not among our uniting values.  Democrats care about people, first, above our country.  Democrats also care about people who were born outside of our borders, as well as people who were fortunate enough to be born within our borders.  We also recognize our responsibilities to the global community and the world environment, and hold those responsibilities equal to our dedication to our own nation.

So, although we do value our communities, families, faith and patriotism, I did not regard these as uniting values for Democrats.  I think if Republicans went through a similar exercise, these values would be included as core values for Republicans.  The caveats I listed above are the meaningful differences between the parties.  In general, the Democratic Party holds inclusiveness as a core value, while the Republican Party seeks to exclude all but the privileged conservative community.

Accountability

The prominent documentation of these values as the Preamble to the State Platform provides a mechanism for accountability among members of the Party.  Office-holders, candidates, party leaders and the rank-and-file can now be held accountable according to the standards that we have set for our collective values.  This is extremely important as the Party works to win hearts and minds of the voting public.  Joe Biden and Ibram Kendi have both spoken about the battle for the soul of America.  Stating our values, and being accountable to our values is surely essential to winning that battle.

Contrast with Republican Values and Actions

These Democratic values contrast sharply with Republican values as evidenced by the actions of various Republican state legislatures, the Republican Congress & Senate, conservative judges, conservative media, and especially of the Trump administration.   It may be that Republicans would claim to hold some of these same values, but their actions belie adherence to these standards or to the plain meaning of the words.

  • Consider kindness.  The Trump administration separated children from their parents and kept children in confinement in conditions that were substandard for prisons, as a way of deterring illegal and legal immigration to the United States.  
  • Consider truth.  The Trump administration has lied daily about matters large and small, from claims about the size of the inauguration crowd to claims of fraud in the 2020 election.  Conservative media should win a prize of ignominy for relentless distortion of truth.  
  • Consider equity.  Republican organizations and governmental units have worked tirelessly to suppress voting by minorities, youth and the elderly.  They have enacted unreasonable barriers to voter registration and voting, closed voting locations, forced unreasonably long lines for voting in minority neighborhoods, obstructed voting by mail, gerrymandered districts, etc., and etc.  If there was a way to obstruct voting for Democrats, Republicans have tried it. 
  • Consider fairness.  Republicans have enacted a tax plan where unearned income from investments is taxed far less than wage income.  And where increasing wealth from unrealized capital gains may never be taxed at all. 
  • Consider financial responsibility.  Republicans have run up huge Federal debts, placing a burden on the next generation, and impairing the ability of the government to deal with crises.
  • Consider environmental responsibility.  Republicans have deconstructed environmental protections for wilderness and wildlife, and supported development programs which are damaging to the environment.  Republicans have denied the science of climate change and the responsibility for the consequences of our greenhouse gas emissions. 
  • Consider progress.  Republicans in the Trump administration, in Congress, and in conservative media have denigrated science and application of science for public health and the protection of the environment.  This denigration of science is a step backwards, toward the dark ages.  This disregard for science is at the junction of the values of truth, responsibility and progress, and Republicans are on the wrong side of all three core values.

This is just a short, off-the-cuff sampling of how Democratic values differ from Republican values.  I could write about these differences all day.  Truly, the difference between what is good, proper, and right, versus what is heinous, shameful and wrong could not be clearer than when you compare Democrats and Republicans on the basis of their values.

Conclusion

So, what does the Values Project mean?  I think it helps to definitively set down the guiding principles and values of an organization.  It establishes who we are and why we advocate for our issues.  It provides a basis for accountability for those who work against our values.  And it provides a stark contrast to our political opposition, for all to see.  In working on this project, I was helped immensely at every step of the way by the ideas of other people.  It is truly a composite of what other people said to me.  At the same time, I was involved at every step of the process, and was able to influence the scope of the proposal.   My own personal values include the idea of legacy – my own contribution to making a better world.  In some small way, the Values Project is a good contribution.  I am quite pleased with the result.

--

Preamble to the Platform of the Alaska Democratic Party

The Alaska Democratic Party, through its candidates for elected office, seeks to govern responsibly for the benefit of all Alaskans. In governing, we are guided by certain shared values that are the foundation of our party; the policies we champion in this platform are grounded in these shared values:

Empathy: We believe that we and our leadership must express empathy to others. Empathy is expressed as compassion, kindness, and generosity.

Truth: We commit ourselves to truth, integrity, honesty and accountability, as individuals, in our actions as a Party, and in how we govern.

Equity: Equity is expressed in fairness, justice, democracy, intentional inclusiveness, equal opportunity for all, human dignity, diversity, and respect.

Service: Our purpose as Democrats is to serve the public. As members of the party and as elected officials, our service is shown by our work ethic, productivity, and humility.

Progress: We believe in human progress to make a better world. Opportunity, economic development, science, technology, and social development are part of our mission to create a better world for all people.

Responsibility: We resolve to leave a better world for those who follow us. We must pursue policies that ensure our resources – human, natural, financial – are managed for the sake of benefiting both current and future generations.

Ethics: Our personal conduct should express the values listed above. We challenge ourselves to achieve even more than those who went before, and leave a legacy of a more just, equitable, and successful society.

This is who we are. This is why we come together as Democrats.

Enacted by the Alaska State Democratic Convention, May, 2020.

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/54bee0c9e4b0441ce96c4681/t/5ec2f771a3129705530a523c/1589835635394/2020+Democratic+Party+Platform.pdf


Wednesday, July 18, 2018

The American Democratic Republic


Today's post is written by a guest author on this blog, my son.  This piece is the result of much reading, research, and thought, and reviewed by editors spanning three generations.  It is about one of the most important topics of our time, our political dysfunction and polarization.  Please take the time to read it.
----
There are real boundaries beyond which our society and system of government can and will break down. There is a minimum level of solidarity required for a nation to survive with citizens rather than subjects, and a minimum level of social stability required for it to function. We can fall too far and merely avoiding disintegrating society is not enough. We must do far better, for ourselves, for the world, and for the future.

Part 1: How the American Democratic Republic Works

As others have already noted, our civil rights, government representation, and social solidarity are degrading. Understanding the mechanics of our republic and their weaknesses is necessary to understand how this degradation is occurring. Note, however, that alternative mechanics have their own different weaknesses. Replacing these mechanics is not a guarantee of revitalization although there might be opportunities for improvement.

The Voting System

The United States of America is a democratic republic. By district, representatives of the people are selected by the majority of eligible voters.
The United States almost exclusively uses first-past-the-pole voting – a winner-takes-all, plurality voting method. In combination with single-member districts, this results in a two-party system because only parties approximately as popular as the most popular party are competitively electable. If one party has about 50% popularity, then it is impossible for two more parties to also be realistically competitive.
The Democratic and Republican parties are not conspiring to keep out additional parties. "Elites" are not conspiring to have exactly two parties. Political patrons are not the source of the two-party system. A two-party system is merely the expected practical result of the current voting system.
In some districts, it's not even Democratic and Republican, but sometimes Libertarian and Republican, or Democratic and Green that are the top two parties – and thus are the only competitive parties capable of possibly winning election in that district at the time. If one party is sufficiently popular in a district, then no other party has a practical chance of winning.
Votes for third party candidates and independents aren't necessarily "wasted", but votes for candidates other than the two most likely to win are "wasted" as much as "extra" votes for the winner or any votes for the loser are "wasted" (insofar as they are more likely to be for a losing candidate). Such votes only communicate support for some value, policy, or proposal rather than deciding the winner of the election.
Only winners make policy.

Single-Member Districts (The U.S. is not Europe)

In Europe (or more specifically, in multi-member districts whose elections award proportional representation), people get to vote for whichever political parties they think best represent their interests. The elected representatives are then sent to the capital and must "form a government" – i.e. agree on which collection of political parties will cooperate to form a governing majority willing and able to vote together in order to accomplish governance. This process involves negotiation and usually involves the party with the most representatives, but not a majority of all representatives, agreeing to one or a few demands from a smaller party that is still large enough to form a majority coalition with the largest party. When these negotiations fail, American news headlines read [European Country] "fails to form a government" or "failed to form a governing coalition".
What would be fully formed political parties in Europe are instead sub-party political units in the United States. American major parties' compositions and coalitions change over time, but at any one time they tend to be led by a specific core constituency. These sub-party constituencies jostle for influence inside the major political parties, and through history they have occasionally withdrawn from one major party to support the other. For example, 1980-2016 saw the libertarian business sub-party (lower taxes, less regulation, smaller government) lead a coalition with the evangelical Christians and the "law and order" sub-parties.
In the United States, the voters instead of the representatives are expected to negotiate among themselves to come up with a workable governing coalition of interests, preferences, values, and policies. If you want your values and agenda to be represented in government, and for your policy preferences to be enacted, then you need to work to put your values and agenda into a winning (i.e. majority) platform at the level of government in which you are interested. If you do not like this situation, then you need to change the voting system.

The Primary and Caucus System


The specific platform and policies a party takes to the general election is decided through the pre-election primary and caucus system. In this system, candidates of the same party, each with a different emphasis on various issues, compete to represent the entire party in the general election. Depending on state law, sometimes all voters are allowed to vote in open primaries, sometimes voters are only allowed to vote in the primary election or caucus for the party for which they are currently registered, and sometimes party members vote in caucuses for delegates to a convention where the delegates then vote for a candidate for the general election.
The kinds of candidates brought to the general election by this system depend on the circumstances. Moderate candidates benefit from swing voters and competitive districts (where multiple parties have a reasonable chance of winning). Extreme candidates benefit from polarization, ideologues, and primary voters who are more concerned with signaling their identity than in winning the general election.
The current situation in the United States is unfortunately the latter for a couple reasons. First, turnout in primary elections is relatively low. This is problematic because ideologically polarized voters are far more motivated and more likely to participate. Second, almost everyone has a distorted view of the prevalence of their viewpoint. Voters tend to believe that the candidate most in tune with their viewpoint has the best chance of winning. So partisans in primaries and caucuses promote extreme candidates and blame general election losses on candidates' insufficient partisanship, instead of insufficient moderation. Even if the general electorate might prefer a moderate candidate, apathy toward the primaries and caucuses results in polarized candidates advancing to the general election.
The primary and caucus system exacerbates the effects of single-member districts on the candidate selection and election process. So does the fact that voters are typically barred from voting in primaries or participating in caucuses except for those of the party for which they are registered. Closed primaries and caucuses prevent voters from voting against the least desirable candidates in other parties while also voting for their most preferred candidate from their own party.

Gerrymandering

When there are districts instead of proportional representation, the district boundaries must be decided upon. And where there is a decision to be made, there is the opportunity to influence the outcome and result of the decision. Thus gerrymandering: the manipulation of electoral constituency boundaries so as to favor a desired outcome.
When successful, gerrymandering functionally eliminates the general election by ensuring that only the gerrymandered party's candidate can realistically get elected. This effectively disenfranchises everyone not registered as members of that party.
Preventing gerrymandering is a chicken-and-egg problem. Only the current majority party has the political power to avoid gerrymandering, but they would be the beneficiary of gerrymandering.
Gerrymandering exacerbates the effects of the primary and caucus system on the candidate selection and election process by reducing the competitiveness of districts (the likelihood that more than one party has a realistic chance of winning a given district).

Low Voter Choice in General Election Voting

All of these factors lead to the glaring systemic weakness of limited voter choice in the United States. When it comes time to actually vote in the general election, most of the politics and opportunity for citizen-led change has already passed and voters are effectively left at best with a choice of supporting A, supporting B, or protest (and living with the systemic choice of everyone else in all cases), and even that choice only practically exists for those living in competitive districts.

Polarization and Political Self-Segregation

But low choice is itself further exacerbated if the voters themselves are polarized and extreme in their views, values, and preferences. Gerrymandering isn't even necessary to create uncompetitive, single-party districts if people choose where to live based on their personal politics.
Fewer voters in the United States hold a mix of conservative Republican and progressive Democratic values now than in the past. Counties in the United States are increasingly partisan – very red or very blue, and less purple. The current trend is that polarization and partisanship are continuing to increase.
Polarization is our principal challenge because nothing about the mechanics threatens the stability of our collective society or the unity of our nation. Self-segregation is the outward manifestation of our failing solidarity. I believe that democratic mechanics cannot survive in an environment of different peoples who desire to be separate and believe others' differences to be so objectionable that they must be forcibly corrected. Ultimately, this is about us, who we choose to be, what we choose to value, and how we interact with others.

Part 2: Sustaining the American Experiment

The American Democratic Republic and the constitution on which it stands is worth preserving.
Sometimes the things that may or may not be true are the things a man needs to believe in the most. That people are basically good; that honor, courage, and virtue mean everything; that power and money, money and power mean nothing; that good always triumphs over evil; and I want you to remember this, that love... true love never dies. You remember that, boy. You remember that. Doesn't matter if it's true or not. You see, a man should believe in those things, because those are the things worth believing in.
-- Hub, in Secondhand Lions [2003]
The American Democratic Republic will survive only so long as enough Americans want the American Experiment to continue more than they want anything else.

Design Expectations

A republican, or free government, can only exist where the body of the people are virtuous, and where property is pretty equally divided; in such a government the people are the sovereign and their sense or opinion is the criterion of every public measure; for when this ceases to be the case, the nature of the government is changed, and an aristocracy, monarchy or despotism will rise on its ruin.
-- Samuel Bryan, the Anti-Federalist Papers, Centinel I [1787/10/05]
No system, no matter how simple or complex, can continue to exist and operate outside of its performance parameters, including governments. All system designs, including governments, rely on implicit and explicit assumptions and expectations about the operating conditions and environment.
The design foundation of the United States of America is the U.S. Constitution, specifying government of the people, by the people, and for the people of the United States of America. The phrasing is Lincoln's, and it refers to the Constitution's guarantee of a Republican form of government, the voting rights of citizens, and the preamble. That foundation has been built upon by American history and culture, expressing additional assumptions about and expectations of the government and its people, documented in the Declaration of Independence, the Federalist Papers, Presidential speeches, Supreme Court decisions, and other expressions of American progress.
Collectively, this corpus of evidence shows that the design of the American government relies strongly upon the cooperativeness of its people and the trustworthiness of the statesmen selected to be their representatives. This government design relies upon its participants – citizens, voters and representatives – to debate with each other instead of fighting when there is disagreement, and to voluntarily act in the best interests of the nation and all of its people rather than acting in self-interest at the expense of their neighbors and fellow citizens. Furthermore, effective functioning of the government requires that we honor both the spirit and the letter of the rules of the Constitution, and participate fairly in the conduct of elections and governance.
If these expectations are not met, if citizens vote to punish rather than to accommodate their neighbors, if politicians seek partisan success ahead of the concerns of the entire community, if special interests confuse their agendas with the best interests of the nation, then this form of government will fail.

The American Experiment

I say to you that our goal is freedom, and I believe we are going to get there because however much she strays away from it, the goal of America is freedom.
-- Martin Luther King, Jr., "Remaining Awake Through a Great Revolution" [ 1968/03/31]
What is the essence of America? The essence of America is finding and maintaining that perfect, delicate balance between freedom "to" and freedom "from."
-- Marilyn vos Savant, quoted in Women Know Everything! by Karen Weekes [2007]
The American Experiment is a unique, transformative concept of society: the idea that a nation can be built on a unified yet multifaceted culture based on ideas, laws, and trust, rather than on religious or ethnic identity and feudal loyalty. The American Experiment began with the creation of These United States of America, established itself and its shared values in the world as The United States of America, and the experiment continues by broadening the answer to "Who is an American?", expanding to include ever more of those with American values, merits, and virtues.

The Making of Americans

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
preamble to the Constitution of the United States of America [1788/06/21]
In my view, America is more than just a country; it is a set of ideals and a system of governance to support Americans’ liberties and our common good. Being American is about more than merely being a citizen of the United States; it is about choosing to live American values. Being American is belief and action, not just accident of birth. Americans are American by choice, by belief, and by deed rather than by birthright. This has been the case since the beginning; the founding fathers were born British, but chose to be Americans.
American values, merits, and virtues are readily identified in its founding documents and the supplemental material created throughout its history. A small sample of relevant quotes is included in Appendix 1.
Collectively, this corpus of evidence shows that being American demands a multitude of values, merits, and actions. Chief among them are personal integrity; care, responsibility, and respect for others; and working toward freedom and justice for all.
Few manage to live up to this calling perfectly, but the important fact is that many try. Being American is about striving to live up to whom we know we should be – every failure of any American is a reminder to all Americans to do better.

Partisanship

I am for freedom of religion, & against all maneuvres to bring about a legal ascendancy of one sect over another, for freedom of the press, and against all violations of the Constitution to silence by force and not by reason the complaints or criticisms, just or unjust, of our citizens against the conduct of their agents.
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to Elbridge Gerry [1799/01/26]
If we do not learn to sacrifice small differences of opinion, we can never act together. Every man cannot have his way in all things. If his own opinion prevails at some times, he should acquiesce on seeing that of others preponderate at others. Without this mutual disposition we are disjointed individuals, but not a society.
-- Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Dickinson [1801/07/23]
The partisan rejects the design of the United States of America, treating it as an obstruction rather than as a foundation. Partisans frequently call themselves "true Americans", but they care more about imposing their values on other people than about upholding the rule-of-law and defending the rights and civil liberties of fellow citizens.
There is not one source of partisans. Every cause has zealots.
Some partisans will loudly voice values you agree with and energetically support your preferred policies. But they are revealed as extreme partisans when they advocate not just for themselves, but against American institutions. The health and independence of American institutions are necessary prerequisites to our system of checks and balances. The integrity and effectiveness of American institutions is necessary for the institutions' credibility.
In the past, extreme partisans believed in monarchy over self determination, they demanded slavery over inalienable rights, they preferred isolation to a world safe for democracy, they became enamored of authoritarians – fascists and communists –, and they denied the truth that all men are created equal. Even now, they endeavor to change America to fit their own image over the objections of those who defend the American experiment.

Maintaining America

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it on to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.
-- Ronald Reagan, address to the Phoenix Chamber of Commerce [1961/03/30]
The work of maintaining America is not the same as its defense by the armed services or its operation by the public services. The work of maintaining America is found in the day-to-day lives of its citizens and the politics of their interactions with each other. The maintenance is performed through the innumerable actions, large and small, of Americans trying their best to live up to American ideals.
America is maintained through voluntary cooperation – whether that is showing up to vote, supporting a non-profit, or assisting a neighbor with chores or errands. Voluntary cooperation is inhibited when people resort to conflict rather than debate, treat compromise as capitulation, or treat disagreement as war to be won rather than an opportunity to contribute to the search for truth.
America is maintained through respectful interaction – whether that is charitably engaging with political issues, tolerating other people's preferences and choices about what makes a good life well lived, or being polite to grumpy cashiers. Respectful interaction is obstructed when people deliberately misinform others, manipulatively argue against misrepresented positions, insult and denigrate opponents, or fail to recognize the rights of others and honor their choice to live differently.
America is maintained by upholding the spirit as well as the letter of the law – not just being a law-abiding individual, but actively self-regulating to save society the effort of regulation, and knowing when peaceful, civil disobedience is called for. The rule of law is corroded when people fail to abide by established process and uphold the validity of the outcome, especially including accepted methods of altering our processes. Peacefully accepting the results of our elections, and the rights and powers of those elected, is central to rule of law in a democratic republic.
America is maintained by acting with integrity and trust – integrity worthy of trust by fellow Americans, and trust of fellow Americans' integrity – whether that is investing to create real value rather than profiting at the expense of other people, preparing healthy food and eating food provided by others, manufacturing safe products and maintaining safe workplaces, or avoiding collisions while driving and trusting other motorists to do the same. Trust and integrity are undermined when people pursue profits that result in harm to society, seek power to the detriment of community, or otherwise create externalized costs borne by society at large and/or by future generations. Trust is a two-way street and must be given as well as earned.
America is maintained by pursuing values, not policies, and by honestly evaluating results – whether that is pursuing freedom by tolerating speech, pursuing justice with juries, or providing for the common defense with the military. Based on experience, these policies have been given practical legal limits in society’s best interest – prohibiting false advertising, guaranteeing legal representation to defendants, and restricting domestic use of the military. American governance is hobbled when policies are pursued without remembering the values they were intended to serve, and when programs are not monitored for results or programs are not revisited when results are poor.
America is maintained by Americans acting in the best interests of society even when they are discontent with their own lives, when they are disgruntled with their fellow citizens, or see opportunity for themselves at others' expense.
The system needs all of these things and more to keep working. There are many more ways to break the system than to keep it working.

Why America Matters 

Despite all of America’s specific problems, it is the oldest democracy in the world. With the exception of Canada, it has the deepest experience with trying to make a multiethnic democracy work. If the forces that are pulling us apart are strong enough to make democracy fail in this country, I fear that similar reasons will also prove strong enough to make democracy fail in most other countries in the world.
-- Yascha Mounk, comment about his book
The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It [2018]
America’s values and behavior matter to the world. Ideologies do not rise and fall directly by chance. Their successes and failures are observed, and ideologies are adopted, amended, or abandoned accordingly.  It matters how America goes about achieving success. It matters that America honestly and transparently commits itself to the philosophy by which it has achieved so much.
The example of a successful democracy is the greatest fear of autocracies around the world. Examples of successful government by the people bolster ideologies of freedom and equality while undermining ideologies of authoritarianism, theocracy, ethnic domination, social hierarchy and control. The reverse is also true. Sophisticated governments understand the consequences. This is why Russia has tried to undermine and divide America. This is why China argues that it offers a “new type of political party system”. When America fails to live up to its ideals, it undermines the resolve in other nations to also pursue those ideals and behave in the best interest of humanity.
America must seek to improve in principle and in practice because it is the moral thing to do. We must avoid authoritarianism and its offer of false social stability. India should be inspired by America, not China; Europe should lean towards America, not Russia; Africa should find a role model in America, not the Middle East. With good reason, they will not do so if American society cannot lead by example – more efficient and effective government, more ethical justice, fairer opportunity, more charitable care, a more trustworthy public. When America vigorously pursues its ideals and improvement at home, everyone benefits – we current Americans get a better system for ourselves, non-Americans get an example of what works better, and the future inherits the better system.

The Best Option

Many forms of Government have been tried, and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.
-- Winston Churchill, in the House of Commons of the United Kingdom [1947/11/11]
This philosophy of liberty and equality, of inalienable rights to life, freedom, pursuit of happiness, secular representative democratic government, international cooperation, and rule of law for everyone is the only known foundation for multicultural peace – internal peace against civil war, and external peace against international war. Historically common alternative attempts at "peace" involved brutally enforced conformity and genocide. The rights of minorities are the precious sacrament by which peace is bought for all. The majority should always remember that it is composed of minorities itself and that every nation is a minority of Earth.
It is essential to the world that the American experiment succeeds, because the world is made of many different cultures, religions and ethnic identities. As technology makes the world smaller, these cultures will inevitably come into conflict, as they have throughout human history. If we hope to have a world without war and without mutual annihilation, then we need a working model for how to live together peacefully. The American Democratic Republic is that model, and we cannot allow it to fail.

A Warning of the Alternative, and a Plea

We all have more at stake in the rules of the game than we do in the outcomes of the game. When that changes, that’s when you begin to lose democracy.
-- David Frum, in interview by Anna Maria Tremonti on CBC Radio [2017/02/02]
If the American Democratic Republic fails, I am pessimistic that whatever comes next will embody the values with which this nation was founded. This nation broadcast hope for all people when it denounced tyranny, rejected slavery, delivered the world from Fascism, defended the world against totalitarianism, rebuilt its enemies into friends and allies, and accepted people of every race, creed, and origin as Americans, equal to all who came before them.
Our execution has not been perfect, and our human pursuit of our ideals has been even less so. We must aim to do much better in the future, but no other values or system of government has brought so much peace and prosperity to the world as American democracy.
If we cannot live and let live, if we fail at the hard work of compromising such that we and our fellow citizens may freely choose how to pursue happiness differently, then society will enter into a vicious downward spiral of violence and retaliation which makes liberty, equality, and democracy impossible to sustain.
We must govern without repression. We must win without destroying the opposition. We must not abuse power by gerrymandering, disenfranchising the opposition, harassing opponents through selective law enforcement, or subverting the judicial system through partisan processes. This is what it means to "play fair by the spirit of the rules" in a democracy.
"Being peaceful" is less noteworthy when the powerful majority does it, but it is not less important. "Being peaceful in the face of incentives not to be" is the foundation of civilization.
The point here is not to convince national leaders of anything. My hope is to convince normal Americans to behave better than could be expected, because we need to behave better than can be expected. Be respectful. Be skeptical and don't share outrageous nonsense. Forgive neighbors, your fellow Americans, who read other news and watch other media, even though we now have trouble agreeing on a shared, objective reality. Trust each other and each others' intentions to be good. This will be especially challenging in the face of a plague of bad information from media companies who have failed to live up to their newfound responsibilities, and weaponized mistrust wielded by foreign adversaries and domestic partisans.
If we do not make our way back to being better Americans, then others among us will follow the darker path to cycles of repression and rebellion – partisan oppression of voting rights and against fair and equal representation in government; protests in the form of strikes, sabotage, and arson; suppression of media, discourse, and speech; riots and bombings; massacres and brutality by law enforcement; assassinations, local uprisings, and revolts; use of the military against civilians. It is a tragically well-traveled road in human history. The United States of America is not immune – see Appendix 2. People have been acting like they do not remember history. Understand that offending, insulting, disrespecting, and repressing people eventually escalates to violence.
We can and we must do better.
We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained, it must not break our bonds of affection. The mystic chords of memory, stretching from every battlefield and patriot grave to every living heart and hearthstone all over this broad land, will yet swell the chorus of the Union when again touched, as surely they will be, by the better angels of our nature.
-- Abraham Lincoln, First Inaugural Address [1861/03/04]


Appendix 1

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed
preamble to the United States Declaration of Independence [1776/07/04]

It is substantially true, that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government.
...
Observe good faith and justice towards all Nations; cultivate peace and harmony with all.
...
I hold the maxim no less applicable to public than to private affairs, that honesty is always the best policy.
-- George Washington, farewell address [1796/09/17]

Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves
-- Abraham Lincoln, letter to Henry L. Pierce [1859]
our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. ... that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.
-- Abraham Lincoln, Gettysburg Address [1863/11/19]

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
-- Emma Lazarus, "The New Colossus" sonnet for the Statue of Liberty [1883]

We must dare to be great; and we must realize that greatness is the fruit of toil and sacrifice and high courage.
-- Theodore Roosevelt, gubernatorial campaign address [1898/10/05]
Be practical as well as generous in your ideals. Keep your eyes on the stars, but remember to keep your feet on the ground.
-- Theodore Roosevelt, address at Groton School [1904/05/24]
There is no good reason why we should fear the future, but there is every reason why we should face it seriously, neither hiding from ourselves the gravity of the problems before us nor fearing to approach these problems with the unbending, unflinching purpose to solve them aright.
-- Theodore Roosevelt, inaugural address [1905/03/04]

the only thing we have to fear is fear itself
-- Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), first inaugural address [1933/03/04]
No democracy can long survive which does not accept as fundamental to its very existence the recognition of the rights of its minorities.
-- Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), letter to Walter Francis White [1938/06/25]
Let us not be afraid to help each other — let us never forget that government is ourselves and not an alien power over us. The ultimate rulers of our democracy are not a President and Senators and Congressmen and Government officials but the voters of this country.
-- Franklin D. Roosevelt (FDR), address at Marietta, Ohio [1938/07/08]

It isn't enough to talk about peace. One must believe in it. And it isn't enough to believe in it. One must work at it.
-- Eleanor Roosevelt, Voice of America broadcast [1951/11/11]
A mature person is one who does not think only in absolutes, who is able to be objective even when deeply stirred emotionally, who has learned that there is both good and bad in all people and all things, and who walks humbly and deals charitably with the circumstances of life, knowing that in this world no one is all-knowing and therefore all of us need both love and charity.
-- Eleanor Roosevelt, in You Learn by Living [1960]

Ask not what your country can do for you — ask what you can do for your country.
-- John F. Kennedy, inaugural address [1961/01/20]
We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard.
-- John F. Kennedy, speech at Rice University [1962/06/12]

Appendix 2

Domestic use of the military: Kent State [1970/05/04] and Jackson State [1970/05/15] shootings